Refusing the Criticizing
Fight Club is a film by David Fincher, which, in addition to a copy of a mind and human activities. It disconcerts and reaches the viewer due to its metaphysical radicality. It demonstrates how our species is exploited and conditioned to put us and our consciousness back to ourselves. Norton said that the Fight Club is a yin and yang like a cleverly innovative coffee table. The Narrator role is played by Norton, who suffers from a hand because the approach of the company. It causes the needs of all aspects: possession, protection, and physiology. It critiques advertisements that convey numerous messages, except that the goods sold are shown.
Fight Club illustrates how an ideological standard of attraction. It includes especially for masculine men and women who suffer from anorexia. In contrast to tightening the thread, Narrator sees a Gucci underwear ad on a bus with Tyler Durden. He asks Tyler why men are like that. Tyler responded by describing self-improvement as masturbation. For Tyler, masturbation is self-destructive. Fincher delivers on the feel of being captured by a sense of independence in the director’s mind. For Fincher, the expression says the recommendation of total freedom destroys life. Tyler makes it clear with all the assumptions of civilization, especially the value of the land.
Subjectively, Fight Club is an accurate picture’s copy of a worker, particularly in this postmodern period, who remains significant in mind. As well as worthy of social criticism, it is also a critique of the exhausting way of life of workers romanticized by expenditure. He plays the Narrator without a name while speaking to a worker in the United States. The Narrator was insomniac from the workload at work before finding a way to deal with the burden by purchasing mechanics and counseling with supporters.
The Narrator reveals a flat packed with the new IKEA furniture by using his paycheck to build a cozy home. He was also invited to undercover therapy and suffered from different forms of diseases to receive him in the party, stir up his feelings at will, and hug other counselors while weeping or complaining while smiling.
As he encounters Marla Singer, who does the same thing, the Narrator’s pessimist perspective emerges. After a business tour and Tyler Durden, a soap maker, the plot resumes again while the worker is on a flight. Since he was made accidental, the Narrator was forced to ask Tyler for assistance, where his apartment and contents were burnt down.
The Insanity of Clone
The tale of the Fight Club is implanted with two figures: Edward Norton and Tyler Durden, respectively, the Narrator of civilization and the machine. He’s the Narrator’s opposite. Norton was the technician to call the fabricator for the top automotive brands. The technician is the film narrator and lead, including his initials, and the viewer does not know how to watch the credits.
Norton is, after all, credited to the Narrator. Identity issues and an implicit inclination to step away from industrial culture caused him to use testicular cancer to take nicknames like Cornelius. The Narrator gives the name he says Jack is named. After all, he’s the first name he reads in the first person article about the human organ.
Tim from Philosophy & Philosophers described and exemplified the relationship between Norton’s character and schizophrenia using the psychopathology handbook. The short explanation is as follows.
- Norton is no longer working and needs to feel another man and is sick: delirium and losing the identity mark.
- The onset of Tyler: he hallucinates and listens to their auditory hallucinations.
- The formation of Fight Club and Project Chaos: intellectual disabilities as in no natural intellectual decline and rearranging the imaginary world.
- Tyler, Marla, and Narrator’s relationship: affective disorder causes emotional numbness.
- Indifference and regression: disturbing sexual activity.
- The acid part of the hand: self-mutilation.
- Fight Club’s primary mission is to create fights with citizens or systems: the unmotivated violence.
Insomnia and Hedonism
Due to working stresses, the Narrator has insomnia. If it is all made up by most people, it is false. There is a connection between labor pressure and insomnia faced by employees among many studies in many industries. It does not mean that in other workplaces, such situations should not exist. The workplace strain in the corporate world takes away employee fitness. This strain, though, seems to be a value price that has a hedonistic lifestyle.
The Narrator decides in the Fight Club and its copy of a mind to shop for different mobilizations, which do not necessarily change the situation. It is the Narrator’s hedonistic type. In addition to this way of thought that still occurs today to staff, he felt his workload was paid for with a spending life. One outcome of work has to be spent on fulfillment and a consumptive life. Many employees are caught in a “vicious loop” by this way of thought.
Working for shopping to remain solid acts as though one’s aspirations can be channeled only to shopping. Those with significant wages will spend their jobs on their own, while those with poor pay keep shopping, even though they await discounts from different markets.
For the Narrator, shopping doesn’t make him feel satisfied. As a social being, he still needs social interaction. However, the workload and environment make the Narrator seem like a stranger. The world outside of work is an alien to the Narrator. This alienated condition causes the Narrator to disguise himself as a sick person solely to fulfill the need for this social interaction. Karl Marx paid attention to this case of alienation, where according to him, the condition of separation was the impact of the capitalist world of work. Workers are made further away from their natural needs as humans.
If only the Narrator fulfills the aspirations by going to various counseling sessions, it is natural because, at the time, there are no social media yet. Mobile is still a luxury item. However, social media today allows workers to do what the Narrator does with the touch of a finger, turning social media into a way to inspire themselves. It is also understandable that many social media users often have different personalities from reality. In contrast, social media provides an opportunity to be someone else with a new name, like a Narrator, when attending counseling. The need is the same, namely to get a sense of acceptance and love as someone else when the realities of work are too stressful.
The Sequence of Nihilism
Tyler Durden is anarchy that opposes civilization, as Fincher stresses that a string between Tyler and Narrator reveals two opposites. Their alliance would lead to an unofficial group named the Fight Club, a club for combat underground that develops into roads to settle in many open areas. The club has eight rules, the first two of which are the most prominent. The first rule is prohibited from discussing the Fight Club, and the second rule is not permitted from talking about Fight Club.
In addition to the expression of consumerism and inequality criticism, a contradiction of these laws must be seen because the Fight Club became a slave society which was disrespectful to specific rules aside from being vulnerable to battle. From the beginning, they understood what their vision and purpose were, but by the end, they did not realize what struggle was other than their initial programs. Following orchestrated criminal combat in pubs at night, Fight Club became a literal and nonliteral injustice body. Members of the Fight Club trust in their tasks, which are becoming the lifeblood of the Mayhem Project and a copy of a mind. It aims to kill credit card businesses to erase debtor files that would lead to anarchy from scratch.
Desecration and Declaration
When Tyler casts acid into the Narrator’s palms, the Narrator gets acquainted with his life, realizing that free will is absent. At the same time, Tyler unlocks Narrator, which gives Tyler a better chance to act before that, and Tyler’s philosophical approach in the Narrator reaches beyond the line between how the Narrator forces his will to be also a way to prove it. This party is a membership, and it is compulsory to fulfill it for its members.
He is also Tyler, the Narrator finds, who is the same person. He understood the value of this intervention and sought, one by one, to strengthen the relationship with Marla in particular. Marla is one of the few women characters, regardless of how people see the Fight Club film as a film that transforms women’s dignity. There are no women at Fight Club, and the argument is suitable for the woman who wants a male with testosterone in it.
Marla, Narrator, and Tyler block one by one until removing one piece at a time. It is essential to the Narrator’s emotional health, and the reality has to maintain his persona. However, Tyler’s materialistic life will not be able to recover. For a long time, Tyler was the lure of the Narrator’s fantasy. Tyler’s projected presence provides a connection between hyperreal and warping. Two such things allow him to communicate with other people entirely through the universe. The Narrator always makes assumptions about who people are most confused about. However, the answer is he. Each meets, and the Narrator leads meetings and projects from start to finish. In reality, the Narrator remains delusional, not lost, or compromised by health in many contexts.
Fight Club has close opposition and brutality on the one hand about mind and copy. However, the use of ideology must remain vigilant without thinking other than behavior. Personally, it displays an outrage like listening to a metal track and insists on an excuse. The darkness and dim light, though whispering, still gave off a sense of complexity. It is explaining a story about what people need and want.
- Barnett, C., Clarke, N., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A. (2005). The political ethics of consumerism. Consumer Policy Review, 15(2), 45-51.
- Bowker, L. H. (Ed.). (1998). Masculinities and violence (Vol. 10). Sage.
- Tim. (2012). Fight Club Analysis. Philosophy & Philosophers.
- Veenhoven, R. (2003). Hedonism and happiness. Journal of happiness studies, 4(4), 437-457.