A Remarkable Achievement
As a prominent American writer whose bibliography includes such famous novels as Blood Meridian, The Road, and All the Pretty Horses, Cormac McCarthy perhaps received less widespread recognition for his equally great work: No Country for Old Men. However, the final novel is a remarkable achievement; it earns a place among McCarthy’s most famous works. In particular, the 2007 adaptation of No Country for Old Men is widely considered the most faithful and successful translation of McCarthy’s novel to the silver screen of the various film adaptations drawn from McCarthy’s corpus.
Similar to his other works, the novel No Country for Old Men explores the more obscure aspects of human nature particularly those aspects manifested as violence, corruption, and the capacity to commit unjustified cruelty. The Coen brothers’ film adaptation of the novel proved to be a commercial success; it features a stellar cast including Josh Brolin, Javier Bardem, and Tommy Lee Jones. The film itself received widespread critical acclaim; it culminated in four Academy Award wins including Best Picture and Best Supporting Actor for Bardem’s outstanding performance. Despite its lack of conventional optimism, the film forces viewers to grapple with deep existential questions regarding the interplay between fate and chance, the concept of predestination, and the extent to which the world operates outside of our control—immune to the influence of our desire for a different reality.
Texas, 1980 and the Aftermath of the Vietnam War
No Country for Old Men is set in the US state of Texas, in 1980. The specific events are important because they occur after the height of the Vietnam War when a brutal conflict became one of the bloodiest chapters in American history. References to the war and its aftermath appear throughout the film’s narrative.
Each of the three main characters in the film has a personal history of violence. However, the motivations behind the actions vary widely. Anton Chigurh (the main antagonist) represents a terrible lack of conscience. He is an assassin. However, his actions were about more than just financial gain. For Chigurh, the act of killing seems to be innate; a twisted extension of his perception of himself as an instrument of destiny. The concept of innocence does not affect him. If someone’s path crosses with his (be it on the open road, inside a hotel, or even in a convenience store), Chigurh reserves the right to impose a sentence of life or death determined by the toss of a coin. The disregard for human agency to the idea of how life and death are completely outside of human will and action becomes a recurring motif throughout the film. The element is exploited expertly by the Coen brothers; they cemented Chigurh’s place as one of the most unforgettable villains in film history.
On the other hand, Llewelyn Moss emerges as a relatable protagonist. Moss epitomizes the Texas working class: a married man, a Vietnam War veteran, and a welder by profession. He also loved hunting; his hobby is often associated with the vast landscapes of his home state.
Although Moss may not be without flaws, the film depicts him as a man trying to act morally. Throughout the story, his actions are largely motivated by the desire to do what he considers right. However, Moss also becomes a pawn in the clutches of fate. The unfortunate reality becomes especially apparent as the film progresses.
The catalyst for Moss’ descent into a dangerous situation occurred during a routine hunting trip in the remote West Texas desert. There, he discovers the horrific consequences of a drug deal gone wrong. The scene is one of carnage and is littered with human and dog bodies; their injuries are evidence of violence occurring.
At the critical moment, Moss made a decisive decision. He had a hidden briefcase containing two million dollars—money not his. The act of taking the money sets in motion a series of events that will ultimately determine Moss’ fate.
From the audience’s perspective, we realize how the protagonist’s decision proves to be a major error in judgment. The action sets in motion a series of events bringing him straight into Chigurh’s crosshairs tasked with retrieving the stolen money. However, the dangerous situation Moss faces is more than just chasing Chigurh. Stolen cash and windfalls are never his right to be evil forces; they draw a web of danger not only from Chigurh but also represent cruel bad luck. Despite his inherent survival instincts and his strong desire to preserve his life, Moss’ actions inadvertently put himself and his wife (Carla Jean Moss) in a dangerous position and endangered their very existence.
Although the film depicts Carla as a proven loyal and caring partner, her character development remains relatively restrained when compared to the male protagonist. The differences are reflected in her limited viewing time and the agency she possesses within the narrative framework. Essentially, Carla functions primarily as a catalyst influencing Moss’s choices and actions. The influence becomes especially apparent after he faces the bloody aftermath of a drug deal and makes the fateful decision to flee with a suitcase full of money. Therefore, it triggered an endless chain of violent events.
The depiction of Carla as a figure functioning primarily to motivate the actions of male characters can be interpreted as aligning with broader thematic concerns. The themes include the concepts of fate, chance, and the seemingly unstoppable progression of violence. In the adaptation, the Coen brothers show a high level of fidelity to the source material. McCarthy’s literary works are often characterized by stark, desolate landscapes and vividly depicted characters. Additionally, his depiction of women can (at times) be considered limited when compared to his in-depth exploration of masculinity and its links to violence.
As the increasingly dire circumstances he faces, Sheriff Ed Tom Bell (a Terrell County pillar finds himself closer to retirement and death than he realizes) grapples with the realization of how although he remains competent in his duties, the increasing violence and crimes he encounters seem to exceed his capacity to respond effectively. Throughout the film’s narrative, Sheriff Bell finds himself consistently one step behind the cruel Chigurh. Limitations caused by his age and the brutality committed by Chigurh prevent Sheriff Bell from directly assisting Moss to the fullest extent of his authority. In the end, Sheriff Bell faces a sad reality: the county is turning into a place where the “oldies” yearn for a peaceful resolution and can no longer hope for a happy ending.
Sheriff Bell finds himself caught in a deep struggle against the metamorphosis of crime and violence engulfing his once-peaceful community. As he investigates the investigation into the brutal crimes committed by Chigurh, Bell is forced to confront the limitations of traditional law enforcement methodology in dealing with such a violent and capricious criminal. Chigurh’s relentless and unpredictable actions provide the real catalyst; it raises deep and disturbing questions about the capacity of law enforcement to effectively combat the ever-growing forms of violence and crime plaguing the modern world.
Additionally, the film deftly highlights the murky and morally ambiguous territory often surrounding law enforcement efforts and the concept of justice itself. Although Sheriff Bell is undoubtedly an authoritative figure and symbol of justice, a closer examination will reveal how the character is deeply troubled by a gnawing sense of unease and growing disillusionment with the world around him (a world seemingly succumbing to the ever-increasing tide of destruction violence and chaos). The actions committed by Chigurh and Moss represent a major challenge to long-held ideas of justice and morality and appear unchangeable; it leaves Bell and his law enforcement colleagues grappling with a deep existential crisis regarding their role in maintaining order and enforcing an increasingly fragile legal structure.
Sheriff Bell faces stark realities throughout the film. The challenges individuals face are nothing new and adversity has always been a constant companion in an unforgiving country. He grapples with confusing truths about the inevitable future and is immune to his attempts to control it. His sphere of influence shrank as a result of increasing age and increasing chaos in his surroundings. The decline raises existential questions about his fate—will his death end peacefully or will the violence reflect the brutality he witnesses every day?
Sheriff Bell embodies the human condition. We have limited control over the world, limited to the choices we make between good and evil. However, life circumstances and the cards we face can sometimes limit our choices. The film underscores the pervasiveness of violence in the world, a seemingly unstoppable force fueled by the evil existing within humanity.
Fate vs. Self-Determination
The main thematic conflict of the film revolves around the opposing forces of fate and self-determination. Each of the main characters has a different perspective on the concepts. Chigurh uses random acts such as a coin toss to relinquish control to an external force (fate) when determining the lives of his potential victims, regardless of whether their deaths were predetermined or a consequence of the actions of his hired services. He uses the idea of predestination as a twisted form of justification for his unrelenting violence and presents it as an inevitable outcome for his victims as if their deaths were predetermined.
In contrast is Moss, an ordinary man working as a welder and hunter. Even though he made mistakes (as any human would), he found himself trying desperately to avoid the consequences of his bad judgment, especially regarding the ill-gotten money he took that could be interpreted as “blood money.” He grapples with the notion of how his fate was determined by his wrong choices, caught in a desperate struggle to escape a predetermined outcome.
Even though Moss had a deeply ingrained survival instinct, the subconsciousness gnawed at him. He is aware of the limitations caused by his physical and mental fortitude in facing the inevitable consequences brought about by his past decisions.
Among the characters, Sheriff Bell stands out as a beacon of morality. However, a painful realization emerged in his mind. He is forced to face the harsh reality of the world, a world far from his idealistic vision. He grapples with the burden of personal agency, recognizing how even though his choice is in his hands, the destruction and rampant violence are still beyond his control. He can only react to the events, regretting his inability to prevent the events from happening.
The Coen Brothers’ filmography is often characterized by a stark and nihilistic worldview. In many of the most serious and brutal accounts of violence, they delve into the visceral nature of violence and its seemingly ingrained presence in the American landscape. The film underscores the idea of how fate, a force beyond earthly control, determines the fate of all individuals, regardless of their moral alignment.
No Country for Old Men stands out as a truly extraordinary film. The film forces viewers to confront a series of deep moral issues by exploring humanity’s inherent capacity for enormous good and unspeakable evil. The cinematography of the film is undeniably stunning, featuring stunning visuals. The acting is also superb, with Bardem giving a particularly outstanding performance as the monstrous Chigurh, a portrayal no doubt deserving of his Academy Award recognition. However, it is important to note how the violence depicted in the film is brutal and very realistic, making it unsuitable for viewers with a low tolerance for graphic content. The Coen brothers have a well-earned reputation for making films aimed at mature audiences, and the film is a prime example of their signature style.
Leaving Questions Unanswered
In particular, the film’s conclusion has sparked a storm of debate among audiences. Avoiding a definitive resolution or closure of the narrative arc, the Coen brothers have created an ending deliberately leaving many questions unanswered and the fate of the characters hanging in the balance. The open-ended approach has the potential to cause frustration in audiences accustomed to the conventions of traditional storytelling (a genre in which conflict is usually brought to a definitive conclusion) and the protagonist achieving resolution or redemption.
However, it is precisely this refusal to provide easy answers or sobering resolutions that elevate No Country for Old Men to the status of a powerful and intellectually stimulating experience. By leaving certain elements open to subjective interpretation, the Coen brothers effectively invite viewers to engage in a visceral struggle with deeper thematic concerns, such as the vagaries of fate, the complexities of morality, and the essence of evil.
Furthermore, the film’s relentless bleakness and lack of clear resolution reinforce the main thematic focus. Set against a backdrop of a harsh and unforgiving landscape, where violence and moral decline permeate the fabric of society, No Country for Old Men paints a cruel and disturbing picture of the human condition. The film’s ending, or rather its lack of it, serves as a powerful symbol; it underscores the idea of how in a world like that there are no immediate solutions or convincing resolutions.
Minimalist Score to Build Tension
The film’s score is minimalist in nature, without a substantial soundtrack. The intentional creative choices serve to increase the tension and force the audience to become engrossed in each scene, looking forward to developments to come. Categorizing the films under a single genre has proven challenging. However, the film is most accurately described as a dramatic thriller superior in its execution. The directors expertly capture the essence of the unique setting of West Texas and the US-Mexico border. For those looking for a film exploring the complexities of human morality, where there is no clear distinction between good and evil, No Country for Old Men will certainly be a rewarding experience. However, it is important to note how the narrative avoids the predictable happy ending characteristic of Hollywood cinema. The departure from convention serves as a reminder of how life does not always end in idyllic happiness, and how death is an inevitable aspect of the human experience.
Bibliography
