The first time I heard about the concept of Backrooms wasn’t through internet stories, but through a feeling I find hard to describe. It’s the sensation of walking through an empty building late at night, surrounded by neon lights and architecture. Familiar yet unnerving. There’s nothing threatening, but the space loses its usual sense of meaning. The tense mix of alienation is at the heart of Backrooms.

The film draws its power from an environment. It resembles everyday places yet resists any attempt to be understood. The yellow walls, repetitive layouts, and artificial lighting evoke spaces designed for human use while detaching from reality, as if existing alongside our world rather than within it. Its horror relies less on monsters and jump scares than on the possibility that familiar spaces can become incomprehensible.

However, the picture becomes frightening when regarded via the eyepiece of Martin Heidegger’s philosophy. According to Heidegger, humans live within a place when it is occupied, experienced, and melded into customary life. The place then becomes meaningful.

Because it resembles a place designed to be inhabited while simultaneously rejecting the very idea of habitation, the authentic imagery of Backrooms is unsettling. The architecture, lighting, and walls are designed for sight, yet there is no indication of any actual presence. As a result, the area discerns the aware and the unknown.

Posts about backrooms and similar content scintillated a series of myths and anecdotes online, condensing into Kane Parsons’ films on the topic. Under the name Kane Pixels, he debuted his first backrooms-inspired film at the age of sixteen. Today, the online popularity of Backrooms has ushered to notable box office success, and Parsons, at the age of 20, has become the youngest director to surpass the $100 million mark.

The Backrooms myth itself stems from a widespread fear of contemporary spaces, which is what makes its evolution so fascinating. People immediately recognized it in anonymous photos on the internet, turning it into a divided cultural experience.

Heidegger has spoken about how people lose touch with their actual home in the modern world. The success of Backrooms shows how a large number of viewers have an innate understanding of the issue, understand how terrifying it is to live in places that no longer feel like home, a community, or a meaningful location, but resemble lifeless buildings that house individuals.

The characteristics of the liminal zone contribute to the film’s horror; the empty spaces blur the line between the strange and the ordinary. The locations possess a gripping emptiness, making it impossible to explain the horror. Parsons adapts the emotions into a short video, using shaky camera work to heighten the suspense of a shock, while orthodox horror techniques blend with the bizarre contemporary horror format.

While Heidegger explores themes of space and spatiality, he does not specifically discuss liminal spaces or corridors in the way described. There are waiting areas to prepare us for our journey to other places. Essentially, the places are temporary. In the Backrooms, the transitions become permanent. The characters are trapped in uninhabited places. According to Heidegger, a meaningful connection to a location is necessary for true existence; it is eliminated in the Backrooms, leaving only an endless, aimless journey.

But how can a story be built around such a fear? You use handheld camera movements, for example, in Parsons’ first feature film, always shooting from within the characters’ perspective. Both the protagonist and the supporting characters move through the back rooms while carrying the camera to record the surroundings, giving us a shaky glance into the transitional spaces. Backrooms heightens the implicit fear of the indoor setting by expanding it into a vast area.

Heidegger’s concept of being-in-the-world is supported by approaches. I was immersed in the characters’ experiences thanks to handheld camerawork. We observe the room from a distance and explore it as disoriented inhabitants trying to find our way. Yet, orientation is impossible. Every attempt to make sense of the surroundings deepens the mystery. Although we are physically present in the area, the characters never inhabit it, trapped in an architecture that resists familiarity, and stay enduring outsiders.

After all, you anticipate seeing a frightening creature slowly emerge in front of your eyes from a zone, and you would perceive that it is caged, and to increase the level of terror, you extend its cage into an endless loop. It’s so convoluted by multiple cycles, and it becomes impossible for you to ever get out.

The idea of homelessness is reflected in the Backrooms through its prison-like environment. In Heidegger’s terms, contemporary existence tends to lead to a disconnection from reality. We lose ourselves and lose a meaningful belonging. The concept is depicted in the structure of the Backrooms, which features an endless loop (not a prison) because it is difficult to escape.

And the final proof of the success of Backrooms is if the movie does indeed feel like one and not a cheap trick, and Parsons succeeds brilliantly. Before moving on to discussing the movie in the genre of horror films, the director and the cinematographer, Jeremy Cox, have succeeded in giving a cheerful visual appearance to the movie. The 20-year-old turns out to be a talented director capable of altering his cartoon shorts into real-life action.

The sun comes down as a huge beam of light, fixed in the sky, giving the life which people have in Backrooms the feeling of as good as colored candies. It shows how much it affects the situation of its main character, Clark, a businessman selling furniture. He has problems in his life because he is a struggling architect, and he tries to make sense of his failing marriage.

When considered under Heidegger’s philosophy, the story of Clark as an unsuccessful architect becomes all the more significant. There is a strong connection between architecture and housing. Buildings are the places where humans take place. The inability of Clark to create a meaningful life for himself becomes noticeable in his inability as an architect. Clark lives in the building but does not belong to it. His career is stagnant, his marriage has failed, and his own mental state has disintegrated. Spiritually, Clark has been homeless before he goes into the Backrooms.

But, on the contrary, he is a recluse who gets irritated quickly and drowns himself in liquor, which aggravates his frustration and ego. He maintains a grudge against the woman he lost, has no friends, and hates his profession.

Clark is a perfect representation of a very appropriate motif to the movie as a universe caught in a glitch. One of the common ideas of Heidegger is how we may find ourselves in false ways of existence. Clark represents such a person very well and keeps doing the same things. He is still caught in comfortable patterns of behavior. The Backrooms do not influence his existence as they do.

Clark becomes trapped in another reality after discovering a hidden portal in the basement of his store. As Clark touches a normal wall, it becomes insubstantial, and he falls into the dark office room of the backrooms.

The wall ceases to be a symbolic boundary. Clark moves from the sphere of daily pattern into the domain of disorientation. Frequently, Heidegger analyzed the tension between the unconcealed and the concealed. Unexpectedly, reality is revealed. The Backrooms emerge from the ordinary environment of a furniture shop, meaning how the phenomenon of alienation lies hidden in a slice of life.

He moves forward, and all he can do is observe in amazement as it continues.

While there are jump scares in Backrooms, it is not all the constitutes the horror element; there is an implicit horror, venturing into the domain of fiction, drawing upon ideas of time and space. With his prestige as the master of the horror of the backrooms, Parsons was the perfect choice for the translation to the big screen.

It is the provided architecture itself of the horror in the film. The Backrooms are scary, appearing habitable, but are not hospitable. Endless hallways, offices, and rooms in the structure meant for occupation, yet everything that is done to make it familiar fails. As per Heidegger, dwelling means rootedness, belongingness, and concern. Systematically, all three are stripped from the Backrooms.

The exchange where Clark attempts to explain to Mary what he witnessed beyond time and space in such a particular area is the most memorable dialogue in the film. The metaphor of Clark, who equates it to being in a world with no dogs and then learning everything about the physical features of a dog before trying to draw it, is fitting. With such aspects correct, there will be a lot of dissimilarities in the sketch.

The Backrooms are the realism in it, how it depicts real places, which is frightening. For instance, Heidegger argued that it is experience and not description that leads to knowledge. Though the Backrooms do not contain experiences that give meaning to the world, they resemble the architectural reproductions of homes and lack homes.

The horror is coming along with the place. Regardless, it is not frightening on its own; it symbolizes an endless number of offices, given the unsuccessful life which Clark leads. Backrooms provide a lot of room for being frightened. At the same time, it represents any way out, a portrayal of the daily struggle of Clark.

The most recurring theme of the film is the correlation between psychology and the environment. The life of Clark is repetitive and boring. Put plainly, the Backrooms bring out the traits. As per Heidegger, individuals get lost in the prosaic nature of things and fail to see the deeper meaning of life. Clark does the same with his life as he wanders around in the halls.

It appears that Clark and Mary experience the same psychological processes again and again, but cannot comprehend them. He gets furious in seconds, although he is reenacting a highly stressful situation with his ex-wife. There is no escape from the self-destruction that is his mind’s maze.

The architectural design in the Backrooms is manifested in the psychological pattern. In the film, you can see how the alienation is not a problem of the exterior. The actual labyrinth resides in Clark. The rooms and corridors are terrifying, representing the inner architecture of unprocessed trauma. Here, you see the significance of the implication of realism emphasized by Heidegger.

Saying how Clark is a fascinating hero from both points of view would be an overstatement. The film fails to build its characters until it drops them right in the deep end, but though it keeps us interested all the way through, it does use such predictable trauma cycle clichés.

But when looked at from Heidegger’s point of view, the tolerable defect of the circumstances becomes more significant in the film than character psychology. Clark always seems more symbolic of the present-day alienation. I decide on how to perceive it as a merit or a demerit.

Not to give any details away, Backrooms is designed to perplex and infuriate a large number of viewers. Nevertheless, its appeal will only grow amongst a small circle of movie lovers due to its ability to raise questions. Nevertheless, it is an unsteady and indecisive film that uses clichés and themes excessively.

At no point in time does the movie fail to appear to lead in an interesting place. In fact, it generally appears to be taking a direction more fascinating than the one that came before. While the quality is an indication of Heidegger’s philosophy itself, the explanations stay hidden, and meaning emerges from questioning.

Though tragedy and the concept of backrooms tie Clark and Mary together, both rarely talk to one another. The plot of Backrooms is easily split into two parts because of a turning point; however, the lack of character development (should have been there for the transition) is not.

Dr. Mary Kline forms the important doppelganger of Clark. Though she has a past herself, which is unresolved and troubled, she tries to assist others in recovering. The feeling of home, which both characters seek, is not in reach yet. A similar dilemma throws light on the greater issues in the film.

The screenwriter of the film, Wil Soodik, has been heavily criticized by critics as well as the audience. It is justifiable given the contents of Backrooms. However, such criticism is not warranted. The sad thing is how, due to the brevity of the film, it is the things that Soodik leaves out that are the issue.

When dealing with slow, minute-long shots, you become absorbed in the feeling of the atmosphere backstage as the people dig deep into such infinity; 110 minutes of the film pass by like almost 30 minutes less. It is ironic how the Heideggerian philosophy is driving the story forward. The film allows me simply to roam around in the space. The strange feeling of living in a place (which is at once familiar and unapproachable) is achieved here.

Despite the fact I wished for such horrific scenes in the second part of the film, Parsons and Soodik are not lacking in imagination, becoming interesting once it leaves the traditional narration aside and give me such eerie moments inside the backrooms.

One of the most spectacular movement shots I have ever seen in any film is the one that shows how architecture becomes a philosophical problem through the discovery of its backrooms. What will happen if a place has no function? What if a structure is able to survive without the house in it?

It is certainly not disappointing to return to the primary narrative, seeing as how Mary and Clark are very interesting bundles of trauma and contradiction. Though she was traumatized from her own childhood, Mary has created an economically successful life for herself because you can work through the trauma cycle.

While it might require such overbearing lines of dialogue for the idea of mind as an inescapable maze to be understood by the audience, it is presented in a fascinating manner and gives you much food for thought after Backrooms ends. Finally, it is an online story and a dimension with many monsters, which the Backrooms turn out to be, a philosophy where the difficulty of life evolves pronouncedly.

Parsons’ depiction is marvellous in terms of understanding how architecture can generate fear. The philosophy of Heidegger converts the film into an exploration of homelessness. Not have the characters been lost in a maze, but in a place where life is no longer possible.

Backrooms is a terrifying story because of its portrayal of a universe made up of rooms heretofore lacking any kind of homes. The endless corridors, vacant offices, and distorted geometry are scary because it defies the human instinct to conform. According to Heidegger, dwelling is fundamental to human beings, and the film imagines the horror of a situation where dwelling has been annihilated. All that is left is endless space without location, motion without destination, and life without dwelling.

References

  • Abidin, C. (2021). Internet Aesthetics and Platform Cultures. Social Media + Society, 7(3).
  • Gennep, A. van. (1960). The Rites of Passage. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1909)
  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)
  • Heidegger, M. (1971). Building Dwelling Thinking. In Poetry, Language, Thought (pp. 141–160). Harper & Row.
  • Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, Language, Thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Harper & Row.
  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Harper & Row.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge. (Original work published 1945)
  • Parsons, K. (2022). The Backrooms (Found Footage) [Video]. YouTube.
  • Snickars, P., & Vonderau, P. (2009). The YouTube reader. National Library of Sweden.
  • Thomassen, B. (2009). The Uses and Meanings of Liminality. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 5–27.
  • Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Aldine.
  • Walsh, R. (2021). Analog Horror and the Aesthetics of Archival Fear. Journal of Horror Studies.