The Dormant State of Pre-17th-Century Philosophy
Before the 17th century, philosophy seemed comfortably asleep in a zone of thought that had formed from the Greek era to the Scholastic era. This period was characterized by a tendency to adhere to traditions and dogmas established for centuries. Philosophical thinking tended to be fixated on existing norms, with little effort to seek innovation or significant change. After the Scholastic era, a phenomenon occurred that significantly impacted the process of reconstructing philosophy in Europe; this period is called the Renaissance. The Renaissance marked a crucial turning point that revived the spirit of research, exploration, and experimentation that had long been dormant. It was an intellectual movement and a cultural revolution encompassing art, literature, and science.
The Renaissance had three factors that contributed to its development across many European territories: the use of machinery, the art of printing, and the compass. The use of technologies such as machinery and the compass significantly boosted exploration and trade, opening doors for the exchange of ideas and cultures across continents. The art of printing allowed for the more efficient dissemination of new ideas, supporting the development of thought and knowledge. In essence, the scientific spirit and technological development became the guiding principles of the Renaissance. Furthermore, this era strongly emphasized human thought as an active agent in creating change and progress. However, upon closer examination, anthropocentrism was the most significant innovation during the Renaissance.
René Descartes, a prominent Renaissance pioneer, played a key role in shifting the paradigm of thought. Descartes believed it was time for humans to be at the center: the formation of subjectivity was no longer as viator mundi (voyager of the world) but as faber mundi (creator of their world). This thought had profound philosophical and scientific consequences, leading humanity toward a new understanding of itself and its world. As a leading figure of the Renaissance, René Descartes became crucial in depicting the significant changes in thought and paradigm during that era. By further investigating his contributions, we can understand the ideas and worldviews that emerged during the Renaissance and laid the foundation for subsequent developments in the history of philosophy and science.
Descartes was born on March 31, 1596, in a small town in La Haye, France. He was the fourth child with a father named Joachim, who worked as a judge. Due to his father’s profession, Joachim was rarely present in the family, especially after the passing of Descartes’ mother. Consequently, Descartes grew up under the care of his grandmother and nurse. Despite being a lonely child, he was known for his cautious actions and intellectual prowess. At the age of eight, Descartes was sent to study at the Jesuit College of La Flèche, where he completed his studies by the time he was around 16. He then pursued higher education at the University of Poitiers, focusing on law for two years. Afterward, he returned to Paris and actively engaged in social activities.
In 1618, Descartes joined the army of Prince Maurice, and in 1619, he became part of the Duke of Bavaria’s forces. Eventually, he decided to live a solitary life in Faubourg, a quiet place far from the bustle of the city, allowing him the solitude needed to create various works. In 1649, Descartes received an invitation from Queen Christina of Sweden, known for its icy landscapes and bears, to teach her philosophy. He said he could only instruct the queen in the early morning, at 5 a.m. This altered rhythm disrupted his habit of waking up late, and before long, it brought unfortunate consequences. Descartes fell ill with pneumonia for a week, and on November 1, 1650, he was found lifeless, marking the end of his remarkable life and contributions to philosophy.
Descartes’ Works: Foundation of Philosophy and Science
During his productive lifetime, Descartes produced several works that laid crucial foundations in the history of philosophy and science. In 1637, his work Discourse on the Method emerged as a significant milestone. Descartes outlined a theory of using mathematical methods to understand physics in this work. This approach not only transformed perspectives on knowledge but also substantially contributed to establishing a scientific foundation that would inspire scientists for centuries. Approximately a decade later, precisely in 1647, Descartes continued his exploration of philosophical concepts by publishing a book titled Meditations on First Philosophy. This work marked a further step in his intellectual journey, delving into fundamental aspects of existence, knowledge, and the relationship between mind and matter. Meditations on First Philosophy not only delved into the realm of philosophy but also significantly contributed to understanding the fundamental nature of reality and humanity.
With these monumental works, Descartes became a prominent figure in the Renaissance movement and shaped critical foundations in developing philosophical and scientific thought. His works continue to be appreciated and studied today, demonstrating the undeniable influence of Descartes’ thinking in shaping our perspectives on the world and existence. In exploring Descartes’ thoughts during his contemplative period, we will delve into several key concepts that form the foundation of his philosophy. First and foremost, we will examine the idea of method, a systematic approach Descartes utilizes to attain certain knowledge. His method, detailed in his work Discourse on the Method, encompasses mathematical aspects and establishes the groundwork for a systematic and organized scientific approach.
Next, we will explore the principle of Cogito Ergo Sum, or “I think, therefore I am.” This statement, renowned in Meditations on First Philosophy, illustrates an undeniable starting point in the thought process: awareness of one’s existence. This concept is a robust philosophical foundation and plays a key role in shaping Descartes’ thoughts on reality, knowledge, and existence. Additionally, we will elaborate on various other ideas explored by Descartes during his contemplative period. It may include his reflections on the relationship between mind and matter, the fundamental nature of knowledge, and philosophical considerations regarding the existence of God. Each concept contributes different dimensions to Descartes’ framework of thought, enriching our understanding of his intellectual legacy.
By detailing these thoughts, we can appreciate the depth and complexity of Descartes’ philosophy, which serves as the groundwork for many developments in the history of philosophical and scientific thought. A more profound understanding of these concepts enriches our perspective on Descartes and provides valuable insights into fundamental aspects of human reasoning about existence and knowledge.
Elevating Methodical Doubt as a Central Pillar
In his profound contemplations, Descartes elevated the treatise on methodical doubt, or the method of skepticism, as a central pillar in his thinking. He embarked on his work with a weighty step, introducing the Cartesian doubt concept regarding everything accessible to the human senses. Descartes took this step because he identified shortcomings in the lack of systematicity in philosophical thinking during his time, particularly in the absence of a well-organized scientific method. In Descartes’ view, the suitable method to revitalize philosophy was methodical doubt and the capacity to question everything.
This concept forms the foundation of his philosophy on method, where Descartes believed that everything, even the most fundamental aspects, can and should be doubted. This thinking establishes the basis for a scientific method that organizes philosophy systematically and instills confidence in true and certain knowledge. Descartes saw doubt as a tool to cleanse thought from untested prejudices and convictions, paving the way for a more substantial renewal in philosophy. By adopting this approach, Descartes transformed perspectives on knowledge and the scientific method, significantly contributing to the development of philosophical and scientific thought in the subsequent era.
Descartes deliberately chose to initiate his process of skepticism by turning inward and questioning everything, starting with doubts about the human senses. His exploration of doubt commenced with meticulously examining the everyday occurrences he encountered. For example, while sitting by a fire in a long-sleeved shirt, Descartes pondered the veracity of this event, considering that such happenings could equally unfold within the realm of dreams. Frequently, we dream of experiences, initially perceiving them as genuine, only to realize their occurrence was confined to the domain of dreams. It prompts contemplation on the distinction between our experiences and those of individuals experiencing mental disturbances like hallucinations.
This illustration acts as a conduit for readers, emphasizing that a genuine understanding of a phenomenon necessitates subjecting it to doubt. Through questioning the authenticity of his personal experiences, Descartes lays the groundwork for the philosophical principle that true comprehension demands a systematic process of doubt and scrutiny. This methodical doubt becomes a potent tool for assessing the reliability of our perceptions and experiences, ensuring that our grasp of reality is rooted in thorough inquiry rather than baseless assumptions. Descartes’ journey into doubt becomes transformative, encouraging us to scrutinize the fabric of our perceptions and beliefs for a more profound and nuanced understanding of the world surrounding us.
The Role of Mathematics in Descartes’ Philosophy
When Descartes constructed the foundation of his philosophy, mathematics became an invaluable tool for him. He recognized the need for a strong structure to build true and indisputable thoughts. Therefore, Descartes devised a mathematical method consisting of two main pillars: intuition and deduction. The intuitive method in mathematics allows thinkers to prove the truth using reason. For example, simple arithmetic equations like 3 + 2 = 5 are the initial groundwork he used to develop more complex conclusions. Thus, this approach guides thinking toward a deeper understanding through carefully applied rational steps.
On the other hand, the deductive method Descartes applies is a process of logical thinking or concluding axioms. An example is in the field of geometry, where all thoughts are considered in a definite order using deduction from accepted axioms as a basis. By combining these two methods, Descartes created a thinking structure that is both deductive and logical to organize the universe of facts. In his thinking, Descartes arrived at a fundamental realization: there is something that cannot be doubted—thought. The culmination of this awareness is encapsulated in his famous phrase, “Cogito, ergo sum” (I think, therefore I am). It becomes the central point in Descartes’ philosophy, indicating that thinking can assure human existence. Thus, Descartes’ dream of having a philosophical foundation that can deduce and attain absolute truth draws closer, with thought as an unshakeable foundation for all his reflections and convictions.
Descartes’ ideas about his philosophical method stopped at the framework of his thinking about the method and involved a profound awareness of a fundamental truth. Descartes realized that when he doubted everything around him, one thing could not be questioned—his existence as a thinker. In Descartes’ view, the subject of thought becomes the primary foundation of his philosophy because it provides an undeniable or unquestionable entity. With this conviction, Descartes articulated his argument with the famous expression, “Je pense, donc je suis; Cogito ergo sum,” translated as “I think, therefore I am.” This phrase became his motto and served as the focal point in developing his philosophical thoughts. Thus, Descartes made a fresh and revolutionary contribution to philosophy by acknowledging that one’s existence can be assured through thinking.
This formulation is not merely a philosophical statement but a revolution in thinking. By acknowledging that an active mind is an unshakeable foundation for one’s existence, Descartes introduced a new idea that shook the traditional foundations of philosophy. This concept was not a breath of fresh air but opened the door to further developments in philosophical thinking, creating a wave of new ideas that influenced many thinkers after that.
Understanding Descartes’ Concept of Thinking
What does it mean to think? This question leads us to profoundly contemplate Descartes on the nature and meaning of the activity of thinking itself. For him, thinking is not merely a cognitive process but a form of consciousness that underlies one’s existence. Descartes expresses that in this context, cogito ergo sum (I think, therefore I am) must serve as the unshakeable foundation to attain a truly convincing truth. Furthermore, Descartes elaborates on the concept of thinking very broadly. According to him, something that thinks encompasses a variety of mental activities, such as doubting, understanding, comprehending, affirming, denying, willing, imagining, and sensing. He even includes feelings because, in his view, feelings, when they appear in dreams, are a form of thinking activity. Thus, thinking becomes an essence of the mind itself, and the mind is always involved in thinking, even during deep sleep.
By detailing the broad concept of thinking, Descartes brings us to the understanding that diverse consciousness and mental activities are integral parts of human existence. In his perspective, the ability to think becomes a distinguishing characteristic that sets humans apart from other entities. Therefore, cogito ergo sum is not just a philosophical statement; it is a call to comprehend and appreciate the depth of human complexity revealed in their capacity to think. From this discussion, Descartes’ concept of thinking is broad and not only partially aligned with contemporary views. All of this can be referred to as a theory of knowledge employing the method of doubt or skepticism. Descartes poses critical questions about what can be known and to what extent truth can be relied upon.
In the subsequent steps of his intellectual journey, Descartes revisits his inquiries into knowledge, including the nature of things like the clockwork universe. Additionally, he reflects on the existence of God, adopting certain aspects of scholastic philosophy but still making it a subject of deep contemplation. Also, Descartes incorporates responses from later thinkers, introducing a discursive dimension that engages various perspectives. Furthermore, Descartes delves into the concept of the body and soul, presenting a framework of dualism that distinguishes between the material and spiritual dimensions. While these ideas are intriguing, we will briefly touch upon them in the following section, as they did not constitute the core of Descartes’ philosophical thinking during his lifetime. Let us examine each step of this intellectual journey to gain deeper insights into the evolution of Descartes’ philosophical complexity.
René Descartes: Shattering Philosophical Paradigms
Driven by groundbreaking ideas that shattered existing philosophical paradigms, René Descartes introduced novel concepts that transformed his era’s perspectives and thought patterns. One of these revolutionary concepts centered around the notion of objects sometimes referred to as the “clockwork universe.” In his work Meditations, Descartes sought to establish a philosophy aligned with rational thinking, connecting to his theory of knowledge grounded in mathematical methods. He labeled these ideas as clear and distinct, exemplified by the certainty of one’s thinking. Expanding on this, Descartes aimed to demonstrate the existence of physical entities by casting doubt on sensory perceptions of these entities—those that are tasted, seen, and more. Descartes’ intellectual contributions extended beyond mere philosophical contemplation; they triggered a paradigm shift, challenging conventional beliefs and laying the groundwork for a more systematic and rational approach to comprehending the world. His methodical skepticism and reliance on mathematics aimed to establish a secure knowledge foundation and acted as a catalyst for transforming the philosophical landscape of his time. The concept of the clockwork universe, characterized by determinism and mechanism, departed from traditional metaphysical explanations, paving the way for the rise of modern scientific thought.
In his quest for a rational philosophy, Descartes scrutinized the nature of reality and sought to establish a method for ensuring undeniable certainty. Grounding his ideas in the clarity and precision of mathematical reasoning, he aspired to create a philosophical framework resilient to rational scrutiny. The skepticism toward sensory experiences and the emphasis on the clarity of thought as a knowledge foundation became fundamental aspects of Descartes’ philosophical legacy. Essentially, Descartes’ intellectual pursuits transcended theoretical contemplation, profoundly influencing the trajectory of Western philosophy and science. His innovative ideas, emerging from a commitment to reason and systematic inquiry, persist across disciplines, providing inspiration for ongoing discussions and reflections on the nature of knowledge and existence.
During that period, Descartes was recognized as an authority on behavior, crafting hypotheses about an emerging worldview. His interpretation of nature was labeled as mechanistic. Fundamentally, he aimed to clarify that the arrangement of the natural world could be understood through the mechanical movement of material substances. According to him, this universe unfolded boundlessly, with objects of diverse shapes and sizes consistently in motion and transforming. In simpler terms, the movements of various entities in the cosmos were considered to be driven by mechanistic forces. This concept prompted responses from his followers, who distinguished Descartes’ perspectives from other theories in physics. Descartes’ proposition regarding this novel worldview suggested that diverse entities in the universe engage in mutual interaction or relations. He theorized that the continuous motion and changes observed in the cosmos were attributable to mechanical forces. This groundbreaking viewpoint challenged established beliefs about the universe’s nature, heralding a new era in scientific thought. The idea of a mechanistic universe governed by predictable and calculable movements marked a departure from traditional metaphysical explanations. In reacting to and expanding upon his concepts, Descartes’ followers played a pivotal role in the evolution of physics theories, representing a crucial juncture in the history of scientific inquiry.
The discussion surrounding Descartes’ theories of the new world underscored the interconnectedness and interdependence of various entities in the universe. This comprehensive understanding of the cosmos as a complex network of mechanistic relationships provided an innovative framework for comprehending natural phenomena. Additionally, it laid the foundation for subsequent advancements in science, influencing scholars’ approach to studying the physical world. Descartes’ enduring legacy as a trailblazer in philosophy and science echoes through time, shaping ongoing debates about the fundamental principles governing the universe’s operation.
Descartes’ Metaphysical Dualism: Body and Soul Distinctions
Descartes employed a metaphysical dualism approach to human existence, acknowledging the separate existence of the body and the soul as distinct entities. In Descartes’ conception, the human body uniquely connects with the soul. In his view, the soul is the driving force, while the body is the determining factor. In other words, every action an individual performs is influenced by past experiences and conditions rather than solely driven by individual freedom. This understanding lays the groundwork for Descartes’ ethical perspective, asserting that humans are governed by passive desires awaiting external stimuli.
Consequently, humans are free creatures, provided they can control and direct their impulses, such as love, hatred, admiration, passion, joy, and sorrow. This freedom is attained through reason and self-control in managing innate urges. This viewpoint is also influenced by the idea that humans, as creations of the Divine, have guidance and direction stemming from a higher Divine order.
René Descartes introduces a captivating phenomenon that captures the writer’s interest in delving into his ideas. There are numerous facets of this historical figure that I have yet to uncover, and my examination of his concepts is still in its early stages. However, one consistent aspect that remains comprehensible is Descartes’ emphasis on consciousness in navigating life and his unwavering commitment to the pursuit of truth. This mode of thought promotes a willingness to contemplate and entertain doubts about various aspects, including the foundational tenets of religion. In doing so, it aids others in gaining deeper insights. In the context of Descartes, doubt extends beyond mere hesitation; it involves ongoing exploration and excavation. The overarching goal of these endeavors is to underscore the significance of maintaining a delicate balance between faith and reason. René Descartes encourages us to embrace systematic thinking, urging us to revisit and reflect on various subjects meticulously.
Bibliography
- Bennett, J. (1990). Truth and Stability in Descartes’ Meditations. Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume, 16, 75-108.
- Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2013). Methodic doubt. Encyclopedia Britannica.
- Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2023). Renaissance philosophy. Encyclopedia Britannica.
- Fumerton, R. (2000). Foundationalist Theories of Epistemic Justification. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Kenny, A. (1985). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 1, p. 109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- King, P. (2016). Rethinking representation in the middle ages: A vade-mecum to medieval theories of mental representation. In Representation and objects of thought in medieval philosophy (pp. 81-100). Routledge.
- Moorman, R. H. (1943). The Influence of Mathematics on the Philosophy of Descartes. National Mathematics Magazine, 17(7), 296–307.